From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stafford v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Sep 18, 2012
No. 3:12-cv-909 (M.D. Tenn. Sep. 18, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:12-cv-909

09-18-2012

HAROLD STAFFORD, Movant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


Judge Trauger


ORDER

The movant, proceeding pro se, has filed a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence, asserting claims based on the insufficiency of the evidence and the ineffective assistance of counsel. (Doc. No. 1.) The Court has examined the motion, as required by Rule 4(b) of the Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedings, and determined that it is not readily apparent on the face of the motion that the movant is not now entitled to relief.

Accordingly, the Clerk is DIRECTED to serve a copy of the motion and supporting memorandum and this order on the United States Attorney. The United States Attorney for this judicial district MUST file an answer, plead, or otherwise respond to the motion in conformity with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings within 30 days of the date of entry of this Order.

It is so ORDERED.

__________________

Aleta A. Trauger

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Stafford v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Sep 18, 2012
No. 3:12-cv-909 (M.D. Tenn. Sep. 18, 2012)
Case details for

Stafford v. United States

Case Details

Full title:HAROLD STAFFORD, Movant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Sep 18, 2012

Citations

No. 3:12-cv-909 (M.D. Tenn. Sep. 18, 2012)