From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stafford v. Hayes

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 5, 1976
327 So. 2d 871 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Opinion

No. Z-301.

March 5, 1976.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Leon County, James E. Joanos, J.

Thomas F. Woods, of Woods Johnston, Tallahassee, for appellant.

William F. McGowan, Jr., and Eurich Z. Griffin of Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith Cutler, Tampa, for appellees.


Appellant, a public relations representative concerned with his client's legislative interests, visited the Hilton Hotel's bar in Tallahassee when the Capitol was evacuated after a bomb threat. He was there photographed by the appellee television crew who entered the bar with cameras and floodlights to examine and record the convivial alternative to work which had thus become available to State employees temporarily displaced from their desks. The lights hurt appellant's sensitive eyes and he was offended and embarrassed by his appearance on television that evening. The trial court correctly determined on motion for summary judgment that the injury to appellant's eyes was not foreseeable by the television crew as a substantially certain result of their camera lights and, consequently, that appellant's claim of assault and battery was unfounded. Spivey v. Battaglia, 258 So.2d 815 (Fla. 1972). The trial court also correctly determined that appellant was an actor in a newsworthy occurrence of public interest and that appellees were privileged to telecast pictures of the group which included appellant. Jacova v. Southern Radio and Tele. Co., 83 So.2d 34 (Fla. 1955).

Affirmed.

McCORD, Acting C.J., and FULLER, RICHARD S., Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Stafford v. Hayes

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 5, 1976
327 So. 2d 871 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)
Case details for

Stafford v. Hayes

Case Details

Full title:DON H. STAFFORD, APPELLANT, v. JOHN HAYES AND TIM SMITH, INDIVIDUALLY AND…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Mar 5, 1976

Citations

327 So. 2d 871 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Citing Cases

Heath v. Playboy Enterprises, Inc.

However, consent is irrelevant to the privileged publication of public facts. Valentine v. C.B.S., Inc., 698…

Sardinas v. M.C.A., Inc.

PER CURIAM. Agreeing with the trial court that the use of appellants' images in the prologue to the movie…