From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stafford v. Basham

United States District Court, Eastern District of Missouri
Dec 23, 2022
4:22-cv-178-SEP (E.D. Mo. Dec. 23, 2022)

Opinion

4:22-cv-178-SEP

12-23-2022

STEVEN STAFFORD, Plaintiff, v. MICHELLE BASHAM, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SARAH E. PITLYK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is Plaintiff Steven Stafford's “Verified Motion for Dismissal of Action(s) and Notice of Filing in State Court Verified Affidavit/Suggestions in Support of Same, &tc.” Doc. [12]. Therein, Plaintiff asks the Court to “grant leave . . . to voluntarily dismiss this action,” as he would prefer to litigate his claims in state, rather than federal, court. Id. at 2. The Court construes Plaintiff's motion as a notice of voluntary dismissal filed pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and will order the dismissal of this case, without prejudice. This dismissal will not count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's “Verified Motion for Dismissal of Action(s) and Notice of Filing in State Court Verified Affidavit/Suggestions in Support of Same, &tc” (Doc. [12]) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED, without prejudice. A separate order of dismissal will be entered herewith.

IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal from this dismissal would not be taken in good faith.


Summaries of

Stafford v. Basham

United States District Court, Eastern District of Missouri
Dec 23, 2022
4:22-cv-178-SEP (E.D. Mo. Dec. 23, 2022)
Case details for

Stafford v. Basham

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN STAFFORD, Plaintiff, v. MICHELLE BASHAM, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Missouri

Date published: Dec 23, 2022

Citations

4:22-cv-178-SEP (E.D. Mo. Dec. 23, 2022)