From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stacey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jul 8, 2011
36 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1487 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

Summary

holding convictions for manufacture of methamphetamine and possession of methamphetamine violated double jeopardy

Summary of this case from Perez-Riva v. State

Opinion

         Appeal from the Circuit Court for Osceola County, Charles N. Prather, Judge.

          James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Noel A. Pelella, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

          Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pamela J. Koller, Assistant

Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


          PER CURIAM.

         We affirm Appellant's convictions and sentences for conspiracy to traffic in 200 grams or more of methamphetamine; trafficking in 200 grams or more of methamphetamine; possession of listed chemical; and tampering with physical evidence. On each of these counts the circumstantial proof was sufficient to support the jury verdict. Based upon double jeopardy grounds, we vacate the conviction and sentence for manufacture of methamphetamine. Ford v. State, 749 So.2d 570 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000).

         AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED IN PART.

          GRIFFIN, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Stacey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jul 8, 2011
36 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1487 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

holding convictions for manufacture of methamphetamine and possession of methamphetamine violated double jeopardy

Summary of this case from Perez-Riva v. State
Case details for

Stacey v. State

Case Details

Full title:KRISTINA L. STACEY, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jul 8, 2011

Citations

36 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1487 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)
36 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1487

Citing Cases

Perez-Riva v. State

On appeal, the State concedes error. We agree. See, e.g., Odom v. State, 104 So.3d 1238 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012)…

Odom v. State

See, e.g., Fonseca v. State, ––– So.3d –––– (Fla. 5th DCA 2012) (“We agree that Fonseca's convictions of both…