From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stacey R. M. v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Aug 9, 2018
No. 3:17-cv-2287-N-BN (N.D. Tex. Aug. 9, 2018)

Opinion

No. 3:17-cv-2287-N-BN

08-09-2018

STACEY R. M., Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated July 23, 2018, the Court finds that the Findings Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Court.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are accepted.

SO ORDERED this 9th day of August, 2018.

/s/_________

DAVID C. GODBEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Stacey R. M. v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Aug 9, 2018
No. 3:17-cv-2287-N-BN (N.D. Tex. Aug. 9, 2018)
Case details for

Stacey R. M. v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:STACEY R. M., Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Aug 9, 2018

Citations

No. 3:17-cv-2287-N-BN (N.D. Tex. Aug. 9, 2018)

Citing Cases

Pitts v. Saul

Plaintiff failed to challenge the VE's testimony on cross-examination at the hearing or to counter with other…

Claudio v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

An attorney represented Claudio at the administrative hearing, and the attorney had ample opportunity to…