From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ST Ventures v. Penfield

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jan 21, 2015
1:12-cv-01058-LJO-SMS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2015)

Opinion


ST VENTURES, a Utah corporation, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BEN M. PENFIELD, et al., Defendants. No. 1:12-cv-01058-LJO-SMS United States District Court, Eastern District of California January 21, 2015

          ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT (Doc. 112)

          SANDRA M. SNYDER, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

         On January 10, 2015, Plaintiffs ST Ventures and Worldwide Investments Inc. filed an ex parte motion for an extension of time to file an amended complaint in compliance with the Court's March 19, 2014 order (Doc. 86), as directed by the Court in its December 12, 2014 order granting Defendant Brown Brothers Harriman & Co.'s motion to strike (Doc. 108). On January 12, 2015, the Court ordered Defendants to advise the Court on or before January 15, 2015, whether or not each opposed the motion. No Defendant responded in any way.

         Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS that Plaintiffs shall file an amended complaint on or before February 12, 2015. No further extensions of time will be granted.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

ST Ventures v. Penfield

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jan 21, 2015
1:12-cv-01058-LJO-SMS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2015)
Case details for

ST Ventures v. Penfield

Case Details

Full title:ST VENTURES, a Utah corporation, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BEN M. PENFIELD…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 21, 2015

Citations

1:12-cv-01058-LJO-SMS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2015)