From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

St. Luke's Hosp. v. Cons. Mut. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 22, 1961
32 Misc. 2d 657 (N.Y. App. Term 1961)

Opinion

June 22, 1961

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, PELHAM ST. GEORGE BISSELL II, J.

Hayt Hayt ( Jonathan Hayt of counsel), for appellant.

Bernard Helfenstein and I. William Berry for respondent.


Where notice of a hospital lien was duly served on the insurance company in accordance with section 189 Lien of the Lien Law, and the insurer settled the action and made payments to the infant and guardian without the required statutory notice to the hospital, it was liable to the hospital for a period of one year in an action to enforce the lien, to the extent of the money paid to the infant and guardian ad litem in settlement of the claim, less the amount of any other liens or claims superior to such hospital lien (Lien Law, § 189).

The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and judgment directed for plaintiff, in accordance with stipulation.

Appeal from decision dismissed.

Concur — HOFSTADTER, J.P., HECHT and AURELIO, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.


Summaries of

St. Luke's Hosp. v. Cons. Mut. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 22, 1961
32 Misc. 2d 657 (N.Y. App. Term 1961)
Case details for

St. Luke's Hosp. v. Cons. Mut. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:ST. LUKE'S HOSPITAL, Appellant, v. CONSOLIDATED MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jun 22, 1961

Citations

32 Misc. 2d 657 (N.Y. App. Term 1961)
217 N.Y.S.2d 843

Citing Cases

United States v. Hage

As a practical matter, nothing need be done by the hospital, since a tortfeasor settling in derogation of its…