From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

St. Anna Wellcare, P.C. v. Geico Ins. Co.

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Jul 21, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 50948 (N.Y. App. Term 2017)

Opinion

2014-1256 K C

07-21-2017

St. Anna Wellcare, P.C., as Assignee of Maria Ramirez, Appellant, v. GEICO Ins. Co., Respondent.

Law Offices of Emilia I. Rutigliano, P.C. (Marina Josovich, Esq.), for appellant. The Law Office of Printz & Goldstein (Megan C. Dimiceli-Glaser, Esq.), for respondent (no brief filed).


PRESENT: :

Law Offices of Emilia I. Rutigliano, P.C. (Marina Josovich, Esq.), for appellant.

The Law Office of Printz & Goldstein (Megan C. Dimiceli-Glaser, Esq.), for respondent (no brief filed).

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Carol Ruth Feinman, J.), entered May 1, 2014. The order, insofar as appealed from as limited by the brief, granted defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed from, is reversed, with $30 costs, and defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Civil Court as granted defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

The proof submitted by defendant in support of its cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint did not establish as a matter of law its proffered defense that plaintiff's assignor's injuries did not arise from a covered incident (see Central Gen. Hosp. v Chubb Group of Ins. Cos., 90 NY2d 195 [1997]). Consequently, defendant's cross motion for summary judgment should have been denied (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]; see also A.B. Med. Servs., PLLC v Clarendon Natl. Ins. Co., 25 Misc 3d 139[A], 2009 NY Slip Op 52383[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2009]).

Accordingly, the order, insofar as appealed from, is reversed and defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.

PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur. ENTER: Paul Kenny Chief Clerk Decision Date: July 21, 2017


Summaries of

St. Anna Wellcare, P.C. v. Geico Ins. Co.

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Jul 21, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 50948 (N.Y. App. Term 2017)
Case details for

St. Anna Wellcare, P.C. v. Geico Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:St. Anna Wellcare, P.C., as Assignee of Maria Ramirez, Appellant, v. GEICO…

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

Date published: Jul 21, 2017

Citations

2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 50948 (N.Y. App. Term 2017)
63 N.Y.S.3d 307

Citing Cases

Bronx Chiropractic Rehab., P.C. v. Progressive Ins. Co.

Thus, the incomplete verification requests did not toll Defendant's time to pay or deny the claim and…