From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spycher v. Andrew

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 2, 1976
55 A.D.2d 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

December 2, 1976


Appeal from an order of the County Court of Chemung County, entered May 20, 1976. Seeking recovery of $848 allegedly still due him under a construction contract between the parties, defendant commenced an action against plaintiff in Justice Court, Town of Elmira, Chemung County, on October 1, 1975. Shortly thereafter, on October 28, 1975, plaintiff commenced an action against defendant in Chemung County Court to recover $5,500 for defendant's alleged breach of the same contract. When plaintiff subsequently moved in County Court, on May 3, 1976, to have the action pending in Justice Court removed to County Court and consolidated with the action pending therein and to have the consolidated actions transferred to Elmira City Court, his motion was granted and this appeal ensued. We hold that the order granting the motion must be affirmed. As conceded by defendant, the County Court had discretionary authority, pursuant to CPLR 602 (subd [b]), to remove to itself the Justice Court action and to consolidate it with plaintiff's action pending in County Court. Moreover, the court did not abuse its discretion because there is no showing that the granting of the motion will result in delay prejudicial to defendant and plaintiff's bill of particulars alleges items of damage which, if satisfactorily proven, would obviously exceed the $1,000 jurisdictional limit of Justice Court. Thus, plaintiff properly commenced his action in County Court, and he was equitably entitled to the removal and consolidation. With regard to the transferral of the consolidated actions to Elmira City Court, the State Constitution (NY Const, art VI, § 19, subd b) empowers the County Court to take such action, which it justified in its opinion by citing the congested County Court Calendar. Order affirmed, with costs. Koreman, P.J., Kane, Mahoney, Main and Herlihy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Spycher v. Andrew

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 2, 1976
55 A.D.2d 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

Spycher v. Andrew

Case Details

Full title:ANTON SPYCHER, Respondent, v. ROBERT L. ANDREW, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 2, 1976

Citations

55 A.D.2d 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

Matter of Clute v. McGill

We hold that while the People have a clear legal right to present misdemeanor charges to a Grand Jury in…

Caracaus v. Conifer Cent. Square Assocs.

We turn now to the landlord's appeal from Judge Todd's denial of its motion to transfer this action from the…