Opinion
March, 1908.
Present — Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Rich and Miller, JJ.
Motion denied on the ground that the correction desired is not necessary to enable the respondent to present his point on appeal.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Sprintz v. Saxton
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1908
125 App. Div. 908 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)
Summaries of
Sprintz v. Saxton
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1908
125 App. Div. 908 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)
Case details for
Sprintz v. Saxton
Case Details
Full title:Ike Sprintz, Appellant, v. William O. Saxton, Respondent
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Mar 1, 1908
Citations
125 App. Div. 908 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)
109 N.Y.S. 1147