This argument presumes that the law does not permit LECs to charge Inteliquent LEC tariff rates for calls that do not terminate to an end-user actually within the LEC territory. SeeSprint Commc'ns Co. v. Crow Creek Sioux Tribal Court , 200 F. Supp. 3d 857, 864–65 (D.S.D. 2016). The parties stipulate that New York law governs this claim.