From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sprinkle v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
May 31, 1930
288 P. 1118 (Okla. Crim. App. 1930)

Opinion

No. A-7363.

Opinion Filed May 31, 1930.

Appeal from District Court, Pontotoc County; Orel Busby, Judge.

Plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of forgery in the second degree, and appeals. Affirmed.

Claude Hendon and Mathers Mathers, for plaintiff in error.

The Attorney General, for the State.


The plaintiff in error was convicted in the district court of Pontotoc county on a charge of forgery in the second degree, and his punishment fixed by the court at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for a period of 5 years.

The appeal in this case was filed in this court on the 13th day of May, 1929. No briefs have been filed on behalf of plaintiff in error, and no appearance was made for oral argument.

Upon a careful examination of the record we find no errors depriving the appellant of any substantial rights.

The evidence being sufficient to support the verdict, the cause is affirmed.

EDWARDS, P.J., and DAVENPORT, J., concur.


Summaries of

Sprinkle v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
May 31, 1930
288 P. 1118 (Okla. Crim. App. 1930)
Case details for

Sprinkle v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHN SPRINKLE v. STATE

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: May 31, 1930

Citations

288 P. 1118 (Okla. Crim. App. 1930)
288 P. 1118