From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Springfield v. Hudson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 11, 2022
2:22-cv-0328 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-0328 CKD P

04-11-2022

CIRON B. SPRINGFIELD, Plaintiff, v. P. HUDSON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

CAROLYN K. DELANEY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Plaintiff has filed a motion for an extension of time to file an amended complaint. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiffs motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 8) is granted; and

2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file an amended complaint. Failure to file an amended complaint within 30 days will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.


Summaries of

Springfield v. Hudson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 11, 2022
2:22-cv-0328 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2022)
Case details for

Springfield v. Hudson

Case Details

Full title:CIRON B. SPRINGFIELD, Plaintiff, v. P. HUDSON, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Apr 11, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-0328 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2022)