From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Springer v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Dec 15, 2014
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 93252 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

Motion No: NO. CA 14-00434 Motion No: NO. CA 14-00435

12-15-2014

TIMOTHY SPRINGER AND JACQUELINE SPRINGER, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THEIR INFANT CHILDREN ADAM SPRINGER, KELLY SPRINGER AND RACHEL SPRINGER, AND PHYLISS ARROYO AND JOHN ARROYO, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THEIR INFANT CHILDREN ALEX ARROYO, CHEYENNE ARROYO, AND MCKENZIE ARROYO, CLAIMANTS-RESPONDENTS, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (CLAIM NO. 111361.)


PRESENT: , SMITH, CENTRA, FAHEY, AND PERADOTTO, JJ.

Appellant having moved for an extension of time to perfect the appeals taken herein from orders of the Court of Claims entered in the Office of the Clerk of said court on September 27, 2013, and October 31, 2013,

Now, upon reading and filing the affirmation of Julie M. Sheridan, Esq., dated November 24, 2014, and the notice of motion with proof of service thereof, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is hereby ORDERED that the motion is granted to the extent that the ordering paragraph of the order of this Court entered October 7, 2014, is hereby amended by deleting the date November 28, 2014, and inserting in its place the date March 27, 2015.

Memorandum: No further extensions of time to perfect the appeals will be granted.

Entered: December 15, 2014

Frances E. Cafarell, Clerk


Summaries of

Springer v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Dec 15, 2014
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 93252 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Springer v. State

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY SPRINGER AND JACQUELINE SPRINGER, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 15, 2014

Citations

2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 93252 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)