Opinion
Page 321a
227 Cal.App.4th 321a __ Cal.Rptr.3d __ SPRAWLDEF et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. SAN FRANCISCO BAY CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION et al., Defendants and Appellants, WASTE CONNECTIONS, INC., Real Party in Interest and Appellant. A137619 California Court of Appeals, First District, First Division June 25, 2014[Modification of opinion (226 Cal.App.4th 905; ___Cal.Rptr.3d ___).]
THE COURT:
On the court’s own motion, the opinion filed on April 29, 2014, and ordered published on May 28, 2014, is hereby modified as follows:
1. On page 1, the first sentence of the second paragraph [226 Cal.App.4th 909, advance report, 2d full par., lines 1-4] is modified to read to as follows:
In the instant writ proceeding, petitioners contend the permit approvals violate the Solano County local protection program and, specifically, a county ordinance, because the expansion will entail some rechanneling of an ephemeral watercourse called Spring Branch.
2. On pages 3, the last word of the paragraph which spans pages 2 and 3 [226 Cal.App.4th 910, advance report, 1st partial par., line 3] shall be changed from "plan" to "program."
3. On page 4 [226 Cal.App.4th 911, advance report, 1st partial par., line 4], the words “Solano County local protection plan" contained in the second sentence of the first full paragraph shall be changed to “Solano County local protection program".
4. On page 4 [226 Cal.App.4th 911, advance report, 1st partial par., lines 6-7], the words “local protection plan” contained in the third sentence of the first full paragraph shall be changed to “local protection program”.
5. On page 8 [226 Cal.App.4th 914, advance report, 3d par., line 4], the words “Solano County local protection plan" contained in the first sentence of the last paragraph, shall be changed to “Solano County local protection program".
Solano County Counsel’s request that the opinion be corrected is hereby denied.
Page 321b
There is no change in judgment.