From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spradlin v. Drennen Cadillac Company, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama
Apr 11, 1991
578 So. 2d 1251 (Ala. 1991)

Opinion

1900043.

April 11, 1991.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County, No. CV-88-500-731, Jack D. Carl, Judge.

M.A. Spradlin, pro se.

Thomas A. Carraway and Deborah Alley Smith of Rives Peterson, Birmingham, for appellee Drennen Cadillac Co., Inc.

Terry McElheny and Sammye Oden Ray of Dominick, Fletcher, Yeilding, Wood Lloyd, Birmingham, for appellee Amerisure Ins. Co.


ON REHEARING EX MERO MOTU


The opinion of April 5, 1991, is withdrawn and the following is substituted therefor:

This appeal is dismissed because the appellant has failed to submit an argument that contains the "contentions of the appellant with respect to the issues presented, and the reasons therefor, with citations to the authorities, statutes, and parts of the record relied on." See A.R.App.P. 28(a)(5) and Stephens v. Lindsey, 542 So.2d 278 (Ala. 1989).

ORIGINAL OPINION WITHDRAWN; OPINION SUBSTITUTED; DISMISSED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and ALMON, ADAMS, STEAGALL and INGRAM, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Spradlin v. Drennen Cadillac Company, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama
Apr 11, 1991
578 So. 2d 1251 (Ala. 1991)
Case details for

Spradlin v. Drennen Cadillac Company, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:M.A. SPRADLIN v. DRENNEN CADILLAC COMPANY, INC., and Amerisure Insurance…

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Apr 11, 1991

Citations

578 So. 2d 1251 (Ala. 1991)

Citing Cases

Jacobs v. Jacobs

This appeal is dismissed, ex mero motu, because the appellant has failed to comply with the requirements set…