From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spokane Val. Land Water Co. v. Madson

U.S.
Jan 25, 1909
212 U.S. 565 (1909)

Opinion

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON.

Nos. 202, 231.

Motion to dismiss. — Submitted January 18, 1909. Decided January 25, 1909.

Writs of error to review judgments of the Supreme Court of the State of Washington, 40 Wn. 414; S.C., 91 P. 1, involving the right of a patentee of the United States to construct a dam across an arm of a lake in the State of Washington, dismissed for want of jurisdiction; plaintiff in error claiming such right under the Desert Land Act of March 3, 1877, c. 107, 19 Stat. 377, and defendant in error claiming that there was no Federal question, or if any existed, it was raised too late.

Mr. S.C. Hyde and Messrs. Gallagher Thayer for defendants in error, in support of the motion.

Mr. Albert Allen for plaintiff in error, in opposition to the motion.


Writs of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Hardin v. Shedd, 190 U.S. 508; Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. McGrew, 188 U.S. 291; Hulbert v. City of Chicago, 202 U.S. 275; Spokane Land Water Co. v. Madson, 40 Wn. 414; Same v. Same, 91 P. 1.


Summaries of

Spokane Val. Land Water Co. v. Madson

U.S.
Jan 25, 1909
212 U.S. 565 (1909)
Case details for

Spokane Val. Land Water Co. v. Madson

Case Details

Full title:SPOKANE VALLEY LAND WATER COMPANY v . MADSON. SAME v . SAME

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 25, 1909

Citations

212 U.S. 565 (1909)

Citing Cases

Converse v. Hamilton

There is nothing in any of the cases arising under the amended Minnesota statute and decided by this court…

Broderick v. Rosner

Wisconsin v. Pelican Insurance Co., 127 U.S. 265. The clause obviously can require no more than this: that…