From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spohn v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Aug 16, 2017
No. 72032 (Nev. App. Aug. 16, 2017)

Opinion

No. 72032

08-16-2017

ASHTON ELDORN SPOHN, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Ashton Eldorn Spohn appeals from a judgment of conviction, entered pursuant to a guilty plea, of five counts of possession of a stolen motor vehicle, four counts of burglary, and one count of grand larceny of a motor vehicle. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Scott N. Freeman, Judge.

Spohn claims the district court abused its discretion because it sentenced Spohn to the sentence recommended in the presentence investigation report (PSI) and, thereby, relinquished its sentencing decision to the Division of Parole and Probation.

The district court has wide discretion in its sentencing decision. See Houk v. State, 103 Nev. 659, 664, 747 P.2d 1376, 1379 (1987). We will not interfere with the sentence imposed by the district court "[s]o long as the record does not demonstrate prejudice resulting from consideration of information or accusations founded on facts supported only by impalpable or highly suspect evidence." Silks v. State, 92 Nev. 91, 94, 545 P.2d 1159, 1161 (1976).

Spohn fails to demonstrate the district court relied on information or accusations founded on facts supported only by impalpable or highly suspect evidence because he fails to point to any errors in the PSI. Further, the district court held a lengthy sentencing hearing where it considered testimony and argument from counsel, the State, one of the victims, two family members of Spohn, and Spohn. After hearing these testimonies and arguments, the district court found Spohn had been on diversion for similar types of cases when he committed these crimes, Spohn's conduct was egregious, and the victim's testimony was powerful. The district court then sentenced Spohn to the recommended sentence found in the PSI. Based on the foregoing, we conclude the district court did not relinquish its sentencing responsibilities to the Division of Parole and Probation and did not abuse its discretion at sentencing. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Silver

/s/_________, J.

Tao

/s/_________, J.

Gibbons cc: Hon. Scott N. Freeman, District Judge

Washoe County Public Defender

Attorney General/Carson City

Washoe County District Attorney

Washoe District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Spohn v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Aug 16, 2017
No. 72032 (Nev. App. Aug. 16, 2017)
Case details for

Spohn v. State

Case Details

Full title:ASHTON ELDORN SPOHN, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Aug 16, 2017

Citations

No. 72032 (Nev. App. Aug. 16, 2017)