From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spitters v. Psynergy Programs

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 2, 2024
22-cv-05030-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jan. 2, 2024)

Opinion

22-cv-05030-HSG

01-02-2024

THOMAS H. SPITTERS, Plaintiff, v. PSYNERGY PROGRAMS, Defendant.


ORDER REVOKING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS RE: DKT. NO. 52

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On December 18, 2023, Plaintiff Thomas Spitters filed a notice of appeal of this Court's December 13, 2023 order adopting Magistrate Judge Beeler's Report and Recommendation to dismiss the complaint, and the Clerk's subsequent entry of judgment in favor of Defendant Psynergy Programs. See Dkt. Nos. 47 & 48. On December 27, 2023, the Ninth Circuit referred the matter for the limited purpose of determining whether in forma pauperis (“IFP”) status should continue for the appeal. See Dkt. No. 52. The Court finds that the issues presented by the appeal are frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(a)(3), (e)(2)(B)(i); Hooker v. American Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002). Accordingly, the Court REVOKES Plaintiff's IFP status.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Spitters v. Psynergy Programs

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 2, 2024
22-cv-05030-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jan. 2, 2024)
Case details for

Spitters v. Psynergy Programs

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS H. SPITTERS, Plaintiff, v. PSYNERGY PROGRAMS, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 2, 2024

Citations

22-cv-05030-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jan. 2, 2024)