From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spinney v. U.S.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 23, 2008
Civil Action No. 06-309 Erie (W.D. Pa. Apr. 23, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-309 Erie.

April 23, 2008


MEMORANDUM ORDER


AND NOW, this 23rd day of April, 2008, and upon de novo review, nunc pro tunc, of Plaintiff's Objections [Doc. No. 36] to Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter's report and recommendation dated February 28, 2008 [Doc. No. 32], recommending that Defendants' motion to dismiss or alternatively for summary judgment [Doc. No. 17] be granted in part and denied in part, the following order is entered:

The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 32] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on February 28, 2008 as the opinion of the Court with the exception of the Magistrate Judge's dismissal of the negligence claim involving the application of the flex-cuffs. The Court finds that there are material issues of fact relative to that claim which renders its dismissal inappropriate.


Summaries of

Spinney v. U.S.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 23, 2008
Civil Action No. 06-309 Erie (W.D. Pa. Apr. 23, 2008)
Case details for

Spinney v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY WARREN SPINNEY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 23, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-309 Erie (W.D. Pa. Apr. 23, 2008)

Citing Cases

Simmons v. Gilmore

Considering Simmons' supporting documentation, the Court can only conclude that Defendants have not met their…