From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spink v. Corning

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 31, 1902
65 N.E. 1122 (N.Y. 1902)

Opinion

Argued October 15, 1902

Decided October 31, 1902

John Van Voorhis and Brown Poole for appellant.

George D. Reed for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, but as the court think the damages in this case are excessive and as this court cannot reverse on that account or reduce the damages, the affirmance is without costs; no opinion.

Concur: PARKER, Ch. J., GRAY, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN and CULLEN, JJ. Not voting: WERNER, J.


Summaries of

Spink v. Corning

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 31, 1902
65 N.E. 1122 (N.Y. 1902)
Case details for

Spink v. Corning

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE SPINK, Respondent, v . ANNA CORNING, Appellant, Impleaded with…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 31, 1902

Citations

65 N.E. 1122 (N.Y. 1902)
65 N.E. 1122