From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spikes v. Spikes

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 15, 1981
396 So. 2d 1192 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

Opinion

No. 80-1931.

April 15, 1981.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Pinellas County, Elizabeth A. Kovachevich, J.

Claudos G. Spears of Allison, Spears Heistand, St. Petersburg, for appellant.

Glenn D. Storch of Myron J. Mensh, P.A., St. Petersburg, for appellee.


The wife appeals from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage, contending that the trial court erred by ruling that the wife was not entitled to alimony other than payment by the husband of the mortgage expenses on the marital home. Although not argued by appellant/wife, we think it was error to credit alimony to the husband for the $285.00 monthly mortgage payments.

The trial court's order, in pertinent part, provides:

The Petitioner/Husband shall pay to the Respondent/Wife, as alimony, the sum of $285.00 per month, until the Wife remarries, or dies or until further order of the Court, such sum being the amount of the principal, interest and taxes and is on the home place, and the same may be paid by the Husband paying the mortgage directly.

The order further provided that the wife will have the sole possession of the martial premises.

By ordering the husband to make alimony payments by paying off the mortgage, the trial court is impermissibly requiring the wife to build her husband's equity in the property. Smith v. Smith, 390 So.2d 1223 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). As noted in Hendricks v. Hendricks, 312 So.2d 792 (Fla.3d DCA 1975), it is the obligation of each tenant in common to pay one-half of the property expenses consisting of mortgage payments, insurance, taxes and necessary repairs. By allowing the husband to use his alimony payments for the mortgage, he is building his equity in the marital home without having to pay for it as his alimony is deductible from his income taxes. 26 U.S.C.A. § 215 (1978).

Accordingly, the judgment is hereby amended to provide that while the marital residence is occupied by the wife, and until the ultimate sale of the property thereafter, the husband will pay one-half of the mortgage expenses (principal, interest and taxes) which will not be credited toward his monthly alimony payment of $285.00.

The judgment as herein amended is AFFIRMED.

OTT, Acting C.J., and CAMPBELL, J., concur.


Summaries of

Spikes v. Spikes

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 15, 1981
396 So. 2d 1192 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)
Case details for

Spikes v. Spikes

Case Details

Full title:SHIRLEY J. SPIKES, APPELLANT, v. JAMES L. SPIKES, SR., APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Apr 15, 1981

Citations

396 So. 2d 1192 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

Citing Cases

Wilkinson v. Wilkinson

The clear intent of the stipulation was to obligate the husband to provide a home for his children, and to…

Trachsel v. S.C.K.W., Inc.

We entirely agree with the trial court's conclusion to the contrary and affirm the judgment in S.C.K.W.'s…