From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spigner v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA BEAUFORT DIVISION
Jul 18, 2016
Civil Action No. 9:15-2828-TMC (D.S.C. Jul. 18, 2016)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 9:15-2828-TMC

07-18-2016

Ricky Valentee Spigner, Plaintiff, v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

Plaintiff Ricky Valentee Spigner ("Spigner") brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") denying his claim for Disability Insurance Benefits under the Social Security Act. This matter is before the court for review of the Report and Recommendation ("Report") of the United States Magistrate Judge, made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Civil Rule 73.02 (D.S.C.). (ECF No. 15). In his Report, the magistrate judge recommends that the Commissioner's decision be reversed and remanded pursuant to sentence four of § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the Report. Plaintiff has not filed any objections to the Report, and on July 18, 2016, the Commissioner filed a notice of her intent not to file any objections to the Report. (ECF No. 16).

The Report has no presumptive weight and the responsibility to make a final determination in this matter remains with this court. See Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270-71 (1976). In the absence of objections, this court is not required to provide an explanation for adopting the Report. See Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983). Rather, "in the absence of a timely filed objection, a district court need not conduct a de novo review, but instead must only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation." Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 advisory committee's note).

After a thorough and careful review of the record, the court adopts the Report of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 15) which is incorporated herein by reference. The Commissioner's final decision is REVERSED and REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative review as set forth in the Report.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Timothy M. Cain

United States District Judge July 18, 2016
Anderson, South Carolina


Summaries of

Spigner v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA BEAUFORT DIVISION
Jul 18, 2016
Civil Action No. 9:15-2828-TMC (D.S.C. Jul. 18, 2016)
Case details for

Spigner v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:Ricky Valentee Spigner, Plaintiff, v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA BEAUFORT DIVISION

Date published: Jul 18, 2016

Citations

Civil Action No. 9:15-2828-TMC (D.S.C. Jul. 18, 2016)

Citing Cases

Ayers v. Berryhill

ns for including a condition that Claimant cannot read or write anything above a sixth grade reading level…