From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spierto v. Pennisi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 8, 1996
223 A.D.2d 537 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

January 8, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Schmidt, J.).


Ordered that the orders are reversed, on the law, with one bill of costs, the motions of the defendants Mercy Hospital and Anthony Pennisi are granted, and the complaint is dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3216 for failure to prosecute.

Having been served with a 90-day notice pursuant to CPLR 3216, it was incumbent upon the plaintiff to comply with the notice by filing a note of issue or by moving, before the default date, to either vacate the notice or to extend the 90-day period (see, Turman v Amity OBG Assocs., 170 A.D.2d 668; Papadopoulas v R.B. Supply Corp., 152 A.D.2d 552). The plaintiff failed to do so. Accordingly, in order to avoid the sanction of dismissal, she was required to demonstrate a justifiable excuse for the delay in properly responding to the 90-day notice and that she had a meritorious cause of action (Papadopoulas v R.B. Supply Corp., supra). The plaintiff failed to meet this standard. Balletta, J.P., Rosenblatt, Pizzuto, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Spierto v. Pennisi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 8, 1996
223 A.D.2d 537 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Spierto v. Pennisi

Case Details

Full title:MICHELE SPIERTO, Respondent, v. ANTHONY PENNISI et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 8, 1996

Citations

223 A.D.2d 537 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
636 N.Y.S.2d 118

Citing Cases

Timko v. Loreto

Having been served with a 90-day notice pursuant to CPLR 3216, it was incumbent upon the plaintiff to comply…

Simmons v. Rockaway One Co.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted,…