From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spiegler v. Israel Discount Bank of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 16, 2002
01 Civ. 6364 (WK) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 16, 2002)

Opinion

01 Civ. 6364 (WK)

July 16, 2002

Anne C. Vladeck, Esq., Vladeck, Waldman, Elias Engelhard, P.C., New York, New York, Attorney for Plaintiff.

Barry Asen, Esq., Alesia J. Kantor, Esq., Epstein Becker Green, P.C., New York, New York, Attorney for Defendant.


ORDER


After reserving decision on three issues raised by the parties at today's discovery conference, we now make the following rulings:

1) Plaintiff is not entitled to discover documents reflecting the age and discipline of employees said to have violated defendant's sexual harassment policy.
2) We will allow plaintiff to discover what the parties have referred to as the Artisan Credit Package. However, we order the parties to enter into a confidentiality agreement concerning these materials.
3) We will permit plaintiff to subpoena Chemical Bank, now known as J.P. Morgan Chase, for records that may draw into question the credibility of Lissa Baum. However, we do not purport to make any ruling as to whether or not such information would be admissible at trial.


Summaries of

Spiegler v. Israel Discount Bank of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 16, 2002
01 Civ. 6364 (WK) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 16, 2002)
Case details for

Spiegler v. Israel Discount Bank of New York

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL SPIEGLER, Plaintiff, v. ISRAEL DISCOUNT BANK OF NEW YORK, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jul 16, 2002

Citations

01 Civ. 6364 (WK) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 16, 2002)

Citing Cases

Gershenson v. Local 52

(Forrest, 3 N.Y.3d at 313; Brook v. Overseas Media, Inc., 69 A.D.3d 444, 445 [1st Dept 2010]). The action…

Baron v. North Fork Bank

Thus, the Court concludes that a rational jury could find that Defendants' stated rationale is a pretext for…