From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sperry v. Rodgers

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 3, 1981
399 So. 2d 465 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

Opinion

No. 80-820.

June 3, 1981.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Pasco County, Wayne L. Cobb, J.

Gary M. Witters of Allen, Dell, Frank Trinkle, Tampa, for appellants.

Charles D. Waller of Waller Hersch, Dade City, for appellee.


This was an action against an insurance broker for negligently failing to cover appellee's truck with collision insurance. The parties stipulated that the truck had been damaged in an accident in the sum of $10,025, but the jury inexplicably brought in a verdict for $20,000.

When parties to the lawsuit stipulate to the amount of damages, any contrary finding by the trier of fact must be conformed to the stipulation.

In the same vein, we reject Utica's hindsight argument that the judgment against it was error because it became a party to this suit only by virtue of a third-party complaint by an original defendant who was dismissed from the case during the trial. Counsel for Utica later stipulated that his client was in the case for the purpose of paying, under an errors and omissions policy, any judgment rendered against its assured, the broker. That stipulation is binding, and it is too late for Utica to try to withdraw from it.

The judgment is reduced to $10,025 and, as amended, affirmed.

HOBSON, Acting C.J., and RYDER, J., concur.


Summaries of

Sperry v. Rodgers

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 3, 1981
399 So. 2d 465 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)
Case details for

Sperry v. Rodgers

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES L. SPERRY, JR. AND UTICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANTS, v…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jun 3, 1981

Citations

399 So. 2d 465 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)