Opinion
2:21-cv-08322-DOC-SP
01-07-2022
Michael R. Spengler Plaintiffs/Petitioners, v. Ramos, et al. Defendants/Respondents.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL OR REMAND
The Court previously received from 0 Plaintiff(s)/Petitioner(s) D Defendant(s)/Respondent(s):
[X] an IFP Request with no accompanying Complaint/Potition/Notico of Removal.
[ ] a Complaint/Petition/Notice of Removal without an accompanying IFP Request - or payment of the filing fees.
[ ] a Complaint/Petition/Notice of Removal with a partial filing fee payment for an amount less than the required $400.
The Court sent a warning letter to [x] Plaintiff(s)/Petitioner(s) [ ] Defendant(s)/Respondent(s) advising that failure to correct this deficiency within THIRTY DAYS from the date of the warning letter would result in dismissal or remand of this case. More than THIRTY DAYS have now passed, and the deficiency has not been corrected.
Accordingly, this case is HEREBY ORDERED
[x] DISMISSED. No. further filings shall be accepted under this case number.
[ ] REMANDED to the . No. further findings shall be accepted under this case number.
IT IS SO ORDERED.