From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spengler v. LASD Does

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 23, 2022
2:21-cv-09515DOC-SP (C.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-09515DOC-SP

06-23-2022

Michael R. Spengler Plaintiffs/Petitioners, v. LASD Does, et al., Defendants/Respondents.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL OR REMAND

The Court previously received from [X] Plaintiff(s)/Petitioner(s) [] Defendant(s)/Respondent(s):

[X] an IFP Request with no accompanying Complaint/Petition/Notice of Removal.
[ ] a Complaint/Petition/Notice of Removal without an accompanying IFP Request or payment of the filing fees.
[ ] a Complaint/Petition/Notice of Removal with a partial filing fee payment for an amount less than the required $400.

The Court sent a Order re IFP warning fetter to [X] Plamtiff(s)/Petitioner(s) [ ] Defendant(s)/Respondent(s) advising that failure to correct this deficiency within THIRTY DAYS from the date of the warning letter would result in dismissal or remand of this case. More than THIRTY DAYS have now passed, and the deficiency has not been corrected.

Accordingly, this case is HEREBY ORDERED

[ ] DISMISSED. No further filings shall be accepted under this case number.

[ ] REMANDED to the ___. No further findings shall be accepted under this case number.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Spengler v. LASD Does

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 23, 2022
2:21-cv-09515DOC-SP (C.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2022)
Case details for

Spengler v. LASD Does

Case Details

Full title:Michael R. Spengler Plaintiffs/Petitioners, v. LASD Does, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jun 23, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-09515DOC-SP (C.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2022)