From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spencer v. Curry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 5, 1961
13 A.D.2d 969 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)

Opinion

June 5, 1961


In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered December 13, 1960, after a jury trial, upon a 10 to 2 verdict of $9,231.20 in favor of the plaintiff. On April 5, 1958, plaintiff, a tenant in a rooming house for two prior years, was about to descend a flight of stairs leading down from the first floor of the premises to the basement, in order to use the common kitchen there located. The stairway was familiar to plaintiff from prior use. She flicked a switch which turned on a basement light that illuminated the bottom steps but left the top two steps of the stairway in a shadow of darkness. The top step was level with the first floor of the premises. Plaintiff claims that because of the dark condition of the top step she made a misstep thereon and fell from the top of the stairway to the basement floor. Without exception, the learned Trial Justice charged that by virtue of section 109 Mult. Resid. of the Multiple Residence Law the defendant lessee had the duty of adequately lighting the stairway. Judgment reversed on the facts, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. In our opinion, on the issue of the plaintiff's contributory negligence, the jury's verdict is against the weight of the evidence. Beldock, Acting P.J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Spencer v. Curry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 5, 1961
13 A.D.2d 969 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)
Case details for

Spencer v. Curry

Case Details

Full title:BEATRICE SPENCER, Respondent, v. ROBERT CURRY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 5, 1961

Citations

13 A.D.2d 969 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)

Citing Cases

Reider v. Whitebrook Realty Corp.

ss of plaintiff's services and for medical expenses is excessive. In our opinion, these contentions are…

Pierpont v. Busa

The issue of plaintiff's contributory negligence was also a question for the jury. ( Reider v. Whitebrook…