From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spencer v. California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 28, 2013
No. 2:13-cv-0372 GEB KJN P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 28, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:13-cv-0372 GEB KJN P

03-28-2013

THURMAN LEROY SPENCER, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motions for appointment of counsel (Docket Nos. 6 and 10), are denied without prejudice to a renewal of the motion at a later stage of the proceedings.

____________________________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Spencer v. California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 28, 2013
No. 2:13-cv-0372 GEB KJN P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 28, 2013)
Case details for

Spencer v. California

Case Details

Full title:THURMAN LEROY SPENCER, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 28, 2013

Citations

No. 2:13-cv-0372 GEB KJN P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 28, 2013)