From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spellman v. Spellman

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit
May 19, 1981
398 So. 2d 654 (La. Ct. App. 1981)

Opinion

No. 12259.

May 19, 1981.

APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, HONORABLE HENRY J. ROBERTS, JR., J.

Trudy H. Oppenheim, New Orleans, for appellee Virginia Dimiceli Spellman.

Powers, Nass Associates, Theodore W. Nass, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellant Elmo J. Spellman.

Before BOUTALL, GARRISON and BARRY, JJ.


Appellee, Virginia Dimiceli Spellman has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal because the appellant's brief fails to comply with the court rules.

We have examined the appellant's brief and find that it fails to comply with Rule IX, Section 1(d), (e) and (f) and Section 3. In fact, the brief of appellant borders on the edge of being frivolous.

However, under the Uniform Rules, Courts of Appeal, the penalty for filing a brief in noncompliance with sections 1 through 6 of Rule IX is refusal to accept the brief, Section 15.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the brief of appellant not be accepted and be returned by the Clerk of this Court to appellant.


Summaries of

Spellman v. Spellman

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit
May 19, 1981
398 So. 2d 654 (La. Ct. App. 1981)
Case details for

Spellman v. Spellman

Case Details

Full title:ELMO J. SPELLMAN v. VIRGINIA DIMICELI SPELLMAN

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit

Date published: May 19, 1981

Citations

398 So. 2d 654 (La. Ct. App. 1981)