From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Special Tree Rehab. Sys. v. Frankenmuth Mut. Ins. Co.

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Jun 30, 2020
944 N.W.2d 682 (Mich. 2020)

Opinion

SC: 156803 COA: 333502

06-30-2020

SPECIAL TREE REHABILITATION SYSTEM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FRANKENMUTH MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.


Order

By order of July 27, 2018, the application for leave to appeal the October 10, 2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decisions in W. A. Foote Mem. Hosp. v. Mich. Assigned Claims Plan (Docket No. 156622) and Dye v. Esurance Property & Casualty Ins. Co. (Docket No. 155784). On order of the Court, W. A. Foote Mem. Hosp. having been decided on October 25, 2019, 504 Mich. 985, 934 N.W.2d 44 (2019), and Dye v. Esurance Property & Casualty Ins. Co. having been decided on July 11, 2019, 504 Mich. 167, 934 N.W.2d 674 (2019), the application is again considered. It appearing to this Court that the cases of Pearce v. Eaton Co. Rd. Comm. (Docket No. 158069) and Brugger v. Midland Co. Bd. of Rd. Comm'rs (Docket No. 158304) are pending on appeal before this Court and that the decisions in those cases may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decisions in those cases.

Cavanagh, J., did not participate due to her prior relationship with Garan Lucow Miller, P.C.


Summaries of

Special Tree Rehab. Sys. v. Frankenmuth Mut. Ins. Co.

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Jun 30, 2020
944 N.W.2d 682 (Mich. 2020)
Case details for

Special Tree Rehab. Sys. v. Frankenmuth Mut. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:SPECIAL TREE REHABILITATION SYSTEM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FRANKENMUTH…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Jun 30, 2020

Citations

944 N.W.2d 682 (Mich. 2020)