Opinion
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-CV-113-RP
03-12-2019
FINAL JUDGMENT
Plaintiff Patricia Spearman filed suit under § 1631(c)(3) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1383(c), for judicial review of the unfavorable decision of the Commissioner of Social Security regarding an application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. The parties have consented to entry of final judgment by the United States Magistrate Judge under the provision of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), with any appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Docket 12. The Court, having considered the record, the administrative transcript, the briefs of the parties, the oral arguments of counsel and the applicable law, and as explained further from the bench at the conclusion of the hearing hereon, finds as follows:
The Commissioner's decision does not comport with proper legal standards and is not supported by substantial evidence. In the absence of reliable medical evidence from a treating or examining physician controverting the opinions of the plaintiff's treating physicians Dr. Jorge Leal and Dr. Jamie Castillo, the ALJ committed error in rejecting those opinions without conducting a proper analysis under Newton v. Apfel, 209 F.3d 448 (5th Cir. 2000) and 20 C.F.R. § 404.1527(c)(2). The functional limitations ascribed to the plaintiff by Dr. Leal and Dr. Castillo were presented in separate hypotheticals to the vocational expert, who testified that the individual in each hypothetical would be unable to perform work in the national economy. Because a proper Newton analysis of the subject medical opinions may have resulted in them being afforded more weight and therefore may have altered the Commissioner's decision, the error prejudiced the plaintiff and is therefore reversible. The Commissioner's decision is reversed and remanded for a de novo review of the plaintiff's application.
SO ORDERED, this, the 12th day of March, 2019.
/s/ Roy Percy
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE