From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spath v. State

Supreme Court of North Dakota
Mar 21, 2000
609 N.W.2d 455 (N.D. 2000)

Opinion

No. 990302.

Decided March 21, 2000.

Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Norman J. Backes, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Douglas W. Nesheim, Wegner, Fraase, Nordeng, Johnson Ramstad, 15 So. 9th Street, Fargo, ND 58103, for petitioner and appellant.

Adam W. Hamm, Assistant State's Attorney, Courthouse, P.O. Box 2806, Fargo, ND 58108-2806, for respondent and appellee.


NOTE: SUMMARY OPINION, SEE NORTH DAKOTA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, RULE 35.1


[¶ 1] Adrian M. Spath appealed from a judgment dismissing his petition for post-conviction relief. Spath asserts he was not afforded his Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel. The trial court found Spath failed to establish that his counsel's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and that, absent counsel's errors as alleged by Spath, the result of the proceedings against him would have been different. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Dale V. Sandstrom

William A. Neumann

Mary Muehlen Maring

Carol Ronning Kapsner


Summaries of

Spath v. State

Supreme Court of North Dakota
Mar 21, 2000
609 N.W.2d 455 (N.D. 2000)
Case details for

Spath v. State

Case Details

Full title:Adrian M. Spath Petitioner and Appellant v. State of North Dakota…

Court:Supreme Court of North Dakota

Date published: Mar 21, 2000

Citations

609 N.W.2d 455 (N.D. 2000)
2000 N.D. 40

Citing Cases

Spath v. North Dakota Dep't. of Corrections Rehabilitation

The North Dakota Supreme Court summarily affirmed the trial court's decision. See Spath v. State, 2000 ND 40,…