From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spangler v. Hendrix

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Oct 24, 2022
3:22-cv-00524-MK (D. Or. Oct. 24, 2022)

Opinion

3:22-cv-00524-MK

10-24-2022

MARK SPANGLER, Petitioner, v. DEWAYNE HENDRIX, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

MICHAEL J. MCSHANE, United States District Judge.

Magistrate Judge Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 5) in this action, recommending that the Petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 be dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72. Although neither party filed objections, I reviewed the legal principles de novo. United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the magistrate's report is correct.

Accordingly, Magistrate Judge Kasubhai Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 5) is ADOPTED, and the Petition (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED, without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Spangler v. Hendrix

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Oct 24, 2022
3:22-cv-00524-MK (D. Or. Oct. 24, 2022)
Case details for

Spangler v. Hendrix

Case Details

Full title:MARK SPANGLER, Petitioner, v. DEWAYNE HENDRIX, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, District of Oregon

Date published: Oct 24, 2022

Citations

3:22-cv-00524-MK (D. Or. Oct. 24, 2022)