From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spangenberg v. Dombrowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 28, 1985
114 A.D.2d 497 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

October 28, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Orange County (Dickinson, J.).


Order reversed, on the law, with costs, motion granted, and complaint dismissed.

Plaintiffs have failed to meet their burden of establishing a prima facie case of "serious injury" as defined in Insurance Law former § 671 (4) (now Insurance Law § 5102 [d]). The allegation of occasional shoulder and/or back pain does not constitute a "significant limitation" within the meaning of the statute (Licari v Elliott, 57 N.Y.2d 230; Post v Broderick, 104 A.D.2d 977; Nolan v Werner Ford, 100 A.D.2d 579, affd 64 N.Y.2d 681). Mangano, J.P., Bracken, Weinstein, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Spangenberg v. Dombrowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 28, 1985
114 A.D.2d 497 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Spangenberg v. Dombrowski

Case Details

Full title:VIOLET SPANGENBERG et al., Respondents, v. STANLEY DOMBROWSKI, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 28, 1985

Citations

114 A.D.2d 497 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Zaffuto v. Martorano

The record establishes that the plaintiff was able to return to work, as a part-time student typist,…

Passonno v. Hall

Special Term found, on the basis of Dr. Constantine's affidavit, that the instant summary judgment motion was…