From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Soward v. Hedgpeth

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 28, 2015
Case No. EDCV11-2062 FMO(JC) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 28, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. EDCV11-2062 FMO(JC)

04-28-2015

DAMION DEWAYNE SOWARD, Petitioner, v. ANTHONY HEDGPETH, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the operative First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody ("Petition"), and all of the records herein, including the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report and Recommendation"), and petitioner's objections to the Report and Recommendation ("Objections"). The Court has further made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge and overrules the Objections.

IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order, the Report and Recommendation, and the Judgment herein on petitioner and counsel for respondent.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

DATED: April 28, 2015

/s/_________

HONORABLE FERNANDO M. OLGUIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Soward v. Hedgpeth

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 28, 2015
Case No. EDCV11-2062 FMO(JC) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 28, 2015)
Case details for

Soward v. Hedgpeth

Case Details

Full title:DAMION DEWAYNE SOWARD, Petitioner, v. ANTHONY HEDGPETH, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 28, 2015

Citations

Case No. EDCV11-2062 FMO(JC) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 28, 2015)