From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Southwest Georgia Land Development Co. v. Hillas

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 9, 1978
144 Ga. App. 670 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978)

Opinion

54543.

ARGUED SEPTEMBER 16, 1977.

DECIDED JANUARY 9, 1978. REHEARING DENIED FEBRUARY 2, 1978.

Confirmation of sale. Dougherty Superior Court. Before Judge Kelley.

Leonard E. Smith, Marion K. Smith, C. B. King, for appellants.

Hansell, Post, Brandon Dorsey, Lowell H. Hughen, W. Dent Acree, Thomas E. Prior, Watson, Spence, Lowe Chambless, E. Dunn Stapleton, for appellees.


An order confirming a foreclosure sale under a deed to secure debt is the subject of the instant appeal. Appellants, who opposed the confirmation, urge two enumerations of error: (1) the court erred in failing to exercise its duty or discretion in determining whether there was an actual default on which the foreclosure was based; (2) the court erred in failing to sustain appellants' motion for dismissal on the ground that appellees failed to prove that the promissory note and deed to secure debt had been transferred from USF Investors to appellees. Held:

1. On appeal it is argued that the trial court erred in sustaining appellees' objection to testimony regarding the matter of default.

"[A]n exception to the refusal to allow a witness, on the direct examination, to answer a question will not be considered by the reviewing court unless it affirmatively appears that the trial judge was notified at the time of the ruling what answer was expected from the witness..." Gordon v. Foundation Co., 25 Ga. App. 309 ( 103 S.E. 269). Accord, Floyd v. Colonial Stores, Inc., 121 Ga. App. 852, 860 (2) ( 176 S.E.2d 111); Jackson v. Sanders, 199 Ga. 222, 231 (11) ( 33 S.E.2d 711). At the time the trial judge ruled, appellants did not perfect the record.

With regard to whether a default occurred this court has held such matter not to be germane in confirmation proceedings ( Jones v. Hamilton Mtg. Corp., 140 Ga. App. 490, 491 ( 231 S.E.2d 491); Hamilton Mtg. Corp. v. Bowles, 142 Ga. App. 882, 884 ( 237 S.E.2d 198); Peachtree Mtg. Corp. v. First Nat. Bank, 143 Ga. App. 17 (2) ( 237 S.E.2d 416)) despite the Supreme Court's consideration of this issue in National Community Builders, Inc. v. C. S. Nat. Bank, 232 Ga. 594 ( 207 S.E.2d 510).

The first enumeration of error is meritless.

2. The appellants in their response to the application for confirmation admitted the allegations that Independence Mortgage Trust (of which the appellees are trustees) was the successor and holder of the promissory note and deed to secure debt of USF Investors. The second enumeration of error is without merit.

Judgment affirmed. Shulman and Banke, JJ., concur.

ARGUED SEPTEMBER 16, 1977 — DECIDED JANUARY 9, 1978 — REHEARING DENIED FEBRUARY 2, 1978 — CERT. APPLIED FOR.


Summaries of

Southwest Georgia Land Development Co. v. Hillas

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 9, 1978
144 Ga. App. 670 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978)
Case details for

Southwest Georgia Land Development Co. v. Hillas

Case Details

Full title:SOUTHWEST GEORGIA LAND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY INC. et al. v. HILLAS et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jan 9, 1978

Citations

144 Ga. App. 670 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978)
242 S.E.2d 267

Citing Cases

Baublitz v. Farmers State Bank

2. The appellant contends that res judicata is not involved because under the holding in Scroggins v. Harper,…

Weems v. McCloud

Peachtree Mortgage Corp. v. First National Bank of Atlanta, supra; Hamilton Mortgage Corp. v. Bowles, supra;…