From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Southern Pacific Co. v. Superior Court in and for Los Angeles County

District Court of Appeals of California, Second District, First Division
Sep 12, 1939
93 P.2d 1055 (Cal. Ct. App. 1939)

Opinion

Hearing Granted Oct. 19, 1939

On petition for rehearing.

Denied.

Prior opinion, 93 P.2d 276.

COUNSEL

W.I. Gilbert, of Los Angeles, for petitioner.

J.H. O’Connor, Co. Counsel, and Douglas De Coster, Deputy Co. Counsel, both of Los Angeles, for respondent.


OPINION

PER CURIAM.

The petition for rehearing herein is denied.

The requirement of the statute that an affidavit be filed as a prerequisite to the issuance of a subpoena duces tecum necessarily presupposes that a judicial determination as to the sufficiency of the affidavit to warrant the issuance of a subpoena duces tecum will be made before its issuance. In fact, the affidavit required to be filed must actually be sufficient to show that the rights of all parties have been protected, and this determination, of course, cannot be made by a ministerial officer.


Summaries of

Southern Pacific Co. v. Superior Court in and for Los Angeles County

District Court of Appeals of California, Second District, First Division
Sep 12, 1939
93 P.2d 1055 (Cal. Ct. App. 1939)
Case details for

Southern Pacific Co. v. Superior Court in and for Los Angeles County

Case Details

Full title:SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO. v. SUPERIOR COURT IN AND FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY.

Court:District Court of Appeals of California, Second District, First Division

Date published: Sep 12, 1939

Citations

93 P.2d 1055 (Cal. Ct. App. 1939)

Citing Cases

Southern Pacific Co. v. Superior Court in and for Los Angeles County

Rehearing Denied Sept. 12, 1939 See 93 P.2d 1055 Original proceedings for a writ of prohibition by the…

C. S. Smith Metropolitan Market Co. v. Superior Court in and for Los Angeles County

In this contention my opinion is that petitioners cannot be sustained, because subdivision 1 of section 259a…