From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Southern Cotton Oil Company v. Texas

U.S.
Feb 27, 1905
197 U.S. 134 (1905)

Opinion

ERROR TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS IN AND FOR THE THIRD SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS.

No. 38.

Argued November 1, 2, 1904. Decided February 27, 1905.

Decided on the authority of National Cotton Oil Company v. Texas, ante, p. 115.

THE facts are stated in the opinion.

Mr. William V. Rowe and Mr. R.S. Lovett, with whom Mr. Ralph Oakley and Mr. James A. Baker were on the brief, for plaintiff in error. Mr. C.K. Bell, Attorney General of the State of Texas, for defendant in error.fn1

See abstracts of arguments in National Cotton Oil Co. v. Texas, argued simultaneously with this case, pp. 118-127, ante.


The Southern Cotton Oil Company is a New Jersey corporation doing business in the State of Texas by virtue of a permit issued June 3, 1897, under the laws of the State. The object of this suit is to forfeit the permit of the company for the violation of the Anti-Trust Statutes of the State. The violation of the statutes alleged against it is the same as that alleged against the National Cotton Oil Company, the preceding case. The defenses are the same, and were presented by demurrer. The demurrer was overruled, and, the Southern Cotton Oil Company declining to plead further, judgment was entered forfeiting its permit to do business in the State, except such as might be and constitute interstate commerce. The judgment was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. A rehearing was denied, and a writ of error from the Supreme Court of the State refused. This writ of error was then sued out.

The questions are identical with those presented in the preceding case, and on its authority the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals is

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Southern Cotton Oil Company v. Texas

U.S.
Feb 27, 1905
197 U.S. 134 (1905)
Case details for

Southern Cotton Oil Company v. Texas

Case Details

Full title:SOUTHERN COTTON OIL COMPANY v . TEXAS

Court:U.S.

Date published: Feb 27, 1905

Citations

197 U.S. 134 (1905)