From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SOUTHBRIDGE PARK, INC. v. FORT LEE BOR

Tax Court of New Jersey
Apr 5, 1984
6 N.J. Tax 351 (Tax 1984)

Opinion

Argued February 28, 1984.

Decided April 5, 1984.

Before Judges ANTELL, JOELSON and McELROY.

Appeal from the Tax Court.

Saul A. Wolfe argued the cause for appellant ( Skoloff Wolfe, attorneys; Saul A. Wolfe of counsel and on the brief). Steven Muhlstock argued the cause for respondent ( Melvin Gittleman, attorney; Steven Muhlstock on the brief).


We affirm the judgment of the Tax court, substantially for the reasons given by John J. Hopkins, J.T.C. in his opinion in this matter published in 4 N.J. Tax 30 (1981). We add that by reason of the stipulation entered into by plaintiff at the pretrial conference we conceive no reason for a remand.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

SOUTHBRIDGE PARK, INC. v. FORT LEE BOR

Tax Court of New Jersey
Apr 5, 1984
6 N.J. Tax 351 (Tax 1984)
Case details for

SOUTHBRIDGE PARK, INC. v. FORT LEE BOR

Case Details

Full title:SOUTHBRIDGE PARK, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOROUGH OF FORT LEE…

Court:Tax Court of New Jersey

Date published: Apr 5, 1984

Citations

6 N.J. Tax 351 (Tax 1984)

Citing Cases

SOUTHRIDGE PARK, INC. v. FT. LEE BOR

It is owned and occupied as a cooperative apartment building and is known as The Plaza. These appeals are…

Southbridge Park, Inc. v. Borough of Fort Lee

This appeal involves the 1980 and 1981 real estate tax assessments of The Plaza, a super-luxury cooperative…