From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Soupkup-French v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jan 21, 2015
No. 66209 (Nev. App. Jan. 21, 2015)

Opinion

No. 66209

01-21-2015

JULIA ANNE SOUPKUP-FRENCH, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction, pursuant to a guilty plea, of burglary. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Connie J. Steinheimer, Judge.

Appellant claims that her counsel was ineffective. Ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims should be raised in post-conviction proceedings in the district court in the first instance and are generally not appropriate for review "on direct appeal unless the district court has held an evidentiary hearing on the matter or an evidentiary hearing would be needless." Archanian v. State, 122 Nev. 1019, 1036, 145 P.3d 1008, 1020-21 (2006). Appellant has not supported her claim with any argument and has not demonstrated that either of these exceptions applies. Accordingly, we decline to consider this contention on direct appeal, and we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Gibbons
/s/_________, J.
Tao
/s/_________, J.
Silver
cc: Hon. Connie J. Steinheimer, District Judge

Suzanne M. Lugaski

Attorney General/Carson City

Washoe County District Attorney

Washoe District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Soupkup-French v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jan 21, 2015
No. 66209 (Nev. App. Jan. 21, 2015)
Case details for

Soupkup-French v. State

Case Details

Full title:JULIA ANNE SOUPKUP-FRENCH, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Jan 21, 2015

Citations

No. 66209 (Nev. App. Jan. 21, 2015)