From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Soumano v. Equifax Credit Info Ser., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Aug 24, 2016
Case No. 1:16-cv-313 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 24, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 1:16-cv-313

08-24-2016

HABIB SOUMANO, Plaintiff, v. EQUIFAX CREDIT INFO SER., INC., et al., Defendants.



Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 40)

This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on July 25, 2016, submitted a Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 40). No objections were filed

As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Report and Recommendations should be and is hereby adopted in its entirety.

Accordingly:

1. Defendant EWS's motion for partial dismissal/motion for more definite statement (Doc. 7) is DENIED; and
2. Defendant Equifax's motion to dismiss (Doc. 14) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 8/24/16

s/ Timothy S . Black

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Soumano v. Equifax Credit Info Ser., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Aug 24, 2016
Case No. 1:16-cv-313 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 24, 2016)
Case details for

Soumano v. Equifax Credit Info Ser., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:HABIB SOUMANO, Plaintiff, v. EQUIFAX CREDIT INFO SER., INC., et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 24, 2016

Citations

Case No. 1:16-cv-313 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 24, 2016)

Citing Cases

Grove v. Mohr

While Rule 12(e) motions are generally disfavored by federal courts, these motions are granted when the…

Chamberlain v. Nat'l Credit Adjusters, LLC

Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a)(2); Bank of N.Y.Mellon v. Azure Estates Owners Ass 'n, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 237262, at *4…