From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Soto v. Norris

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fayetteville Division
Aug 21, 2007
Civil No. 07-5026 (W.D. Ark. Aug. 21, 2007)

Opinion

Civil No. 07-5026.

August 21, 2007


ORDER


NOW on this 21st day of August, 2007, comes on for consideration the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 9) in this matter. Petitioner has filed written objections (Doc. 11) to the Report and Recommendation. The Court has reviewed this case de novo and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds that the Report And Recommendation is sound in all respects; that the petitioner's objections thereto offer neither law nor fact requiring departure from the Report and Recommendation and the same should be, and it hereby is, adopted in toto.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report And Recommendation is adopted in toto.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth therein, the instant petition is denied and dismissed with prejudice. Petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. 12) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Soto v. Norris

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fayetteville Division
Aug 21, 2007
Civil No. 07-5026 (W.D. Ark. Aug. 21, 2007)
Case details for

Soto v. Norris

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT SHAWN SOTO PETITIONER v. LARRY NORRIS, Director Arkansas Department…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fayetteville Division

Date published: Aug 21, 2007

Citations

Civil No. 07-5026 (W.D. Ark. Aug. 21, 2007)