Sortisio v. Accetta

Full title: JEANINE A. SORTISIO, STEVEN R. SORTISIO, Plaintiffs, v. PETER ACCETTA…

Court: United States District Court, W.D. New York

Date published: Dec 7, 2009

09-CV-176 (W.D.N.Y. Dec. 7, 2009)

Opinion

09-CV-176.

December 7, 2009

ORDER

RICHARD ARCARA, District Judge

This case was referred to Magistrate Judge Hugh B. Scott, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On April 15, 2009, plaintiffs filed a motion to remand. On June 22, 2009, Magistrate Judge Scott filed a Report and Recommendation, recommending that plaintiffs' motion to remand be granted.

Plaintiff filed objections to the Report and Recommendation on July 6, 2009. Oral argument on the objections was held on November 13, 2009.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court must make a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. Upon a de novo review of the Report and Recommendation, and after reviewing the submissions and hearing argument from the parties, the Court adopts the proposed findings of the Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Scott's Report and Recommendation, plaintiffs' motion to remand is granted. The Clerk of Court shall take all steps necessary to close the case.

SO ORDERED.