Opinion
00-144.
Decided October 13, 2000.
Landlord appeals from an order of the Civil Court, New York County, entered July 13, 1999 (Rolando T. Acosta, J.) restoring tenant to possession on condition that tenant pay rental arrears in the amount of $5,745.71.
Order entered July 13, 1999 (Rolando T. Acosta, J.) affirmed, with $10 costs.
PRESENT: HON. WILLIAM P. McCOOE, J.P. HON. PHYLLIS GANGEL-JACOB HON. LUCINDO SUAREZ, Justices.
Tenant, who has resided in the subject premises since 1979, promptly moved for restoration following her eviction. Her failure to timely pay the rent was due, at least in part, to attempts to obtain PSA assistance which ultimately failed, as well as delays encountered in attempting to obtain a stipend for the rent from DSS. Tenant was able to pay the full amount of rental arrears to landlord prior to her restoration. Given these circumstances, we find that Civil Court did not abuse its discretion in vacating the warrant of eviction and restoring tenant to possession of her apartment after the warrant was executed, on condition that tenant pay the full amount of rent due and incidental relief (Brusco v. Braun, 84 NY2d 674, 682). The court's order is amended to read that it is "without prejudice to petitioner's claim for rent increases related to new appliances and flooring, and attorneys' fees incurred in this litigation" (emphasis added).
This constitutes the decision and order of the court.