From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sonnenfeld v. Sonnenfeld

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
May 4, 2007
954 So. 2d 1279 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

Nos. 5D05-3558, 5D05-4162.

May 4, 2007.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, John V. Doyle, Judge.

Joan Stefanec Briggs of Adams, Briggs and Briggs, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Horace Smith, Jr. of Horace Smith, Jr., P. A; Smith, Hood, Perkins, Loucks, Stout, Bigman, Lane and Brock, P.A., Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


We reverse that part of the final judgment awarding attorney's fees to the former wife in this dissolution of marriage proceeding. We do so because it is clear from the record that "[t]he trial court abused its discretion in this regard after making an equal distribution of marital assets and equalizing incomes through the alimony award." Naugle v. Naugle, 632 So.2d 1146, 1147 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). Otherwise, the Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage is affirmed.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.

TORPY, J. and MUNYON, L.T., Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Sonnenfeld v. Sonnenfeld

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
May 4, 2007
954 So. 2d 1279 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

Sonnenfeld v. Sonnenfeld

Case Details

Full title:Roger E. SONNENFELD, Appellant, v. Tina SONNENFELD, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: May 4, 2007

Citations

954 So. 2d 1279 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Citing Cases

Beebe v. Roman

An award of alimony that results in the equalization of income is not per se improper. See, e.g., Sonnenfeld…