Sommers v. United States

Full title: NATHAN SOMMERS, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Mar 11, 2022

No. 2021-1652 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 11, 2022)

Opinion

2021-1652

03-11-2022

NATHAN SOMMERS, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee

John B. Wells, Law Office of John B. Wells, Slidell, LA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Douglas Glenn Edelschick, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by Brian M. Boynton, Martin F. Hockey, Jr., Douglas K. Mickle; Jessica Brooke Colsia, Frederick Rudesheim, Litigation Division, United States Army Legal Services Agency, Fort Belvoir, VA.

Per Curiam.

This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:14-cv-00690-RAH, Judge Richard A. Hertling.

John B. Wells, Law Office of John B. Wells, Slidell, LA, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

Douglas Glenn Edelschick, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by Brian M. Boynton, Martin F. Hockey, Jr., Douglas K. Mickle; Jessica Brooke Colsia, Frederick Rudesheim, Litigation Division, United States Army Legal Services Agency, Fort Belvoir, VA.

JUDGMENT

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

Per Curiam.

(Prost, Bryson, and Stoll, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.