From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Solow Management Corp. v. Seltzer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 31, 2005
18 A.D.3d 399 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

6197.

May 31, 2005.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Kapnick, J.), entered December 6, 2004, which, upon the prior grant of defendant's motion pursuant to CPLR 3211, dismissed the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Before: Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Marlow, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.


Contrary to plaintiff's arguments, the complaint sets forth but one arguable misrepresentation by defendant and accordingly does not allege a cognizable claim under Judiciary Law § 487, which provides recourse only where there is a chronic and extreme pattern of legal delinquency ( see Jaroslawicz v. Cohen, 12 AD3d 160; Havell v. Islam, 292 AD2d 210).


Summaries of

Solow Management Corp. v. Seltzer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 31, 2005
18 A.D.3d 399 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Solow Management Corp. v. Seltzer

Case Details

Full title:SOLOW MANAGEMENT CORP., Appellant, v. RICHARD C. SELTZER, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 31, 2005

Citations

18 A.D.3d 399 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
795 N.Y.S.2d 448

Citing Cases

Wadsworth Avenue v. Paul Hastings

To properly plead this cause of action, plaintiff must allege facts showing that the attorney engaged in a…

Trepel v. Dippold

" Izko Sportswear Co. v. Flaum, 809 N.Y.S.2d 119, 122 (App.Div. 2006) (citation omitted). While "one arguable…