From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Solovic v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Apr 17, 2018
544 S.W.3d 700 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. ED 105480

04-17-2018

Scott SOLOVIC, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Kevin B. Gau, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, Saint Louis, MO. 63101, for appellant. Mary H. Moore, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO. 65102, for respondent.


Kevin B. Gau, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, Saint Louis, MO. 63101, for appellant.

Mary H. Moore, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO. 65102, for respondent.

Before Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., Angela T. Quigless, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Scott Solovic appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Motion requesting post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2017).

All references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. 2016, unless otherwise indicated.
--------


Summaries of

Solovic v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Apr 17, 2018
544 S.W.3d 700 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Solovic v. State

Case Details

Full title:Scott SOLOVIC, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Date published: Apr 17, 2018

Citations

544 S.W.3d 700 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)